DramatismThis is a featured page

The theoretical framework of dramatistism is derived from Burke’s (1969) Pentad. This framework allows attention on the act being undertaken, the scene where the act occurs, the agent responsible for the act, the agency through which the agent engages in the act, and the purpose for which the agent engages in the act.
As Burke notes, “both act and agent require scenes that ‘contain’ them” (p15). In this way, both act and agent can be partially defined by their presence in the scene. ... The distinction between forms of act that put the agent in the scene is necessary for a full analysis of the scene. Burke (1969 p16) notes the indeterminate nature of using an interaction (ratio) between the agent and the act in the following way
The scene-act and scene-agent ratios are in the fullest sense positive (or ‘positional’). But the relation between act and agent is not quite the same. The agent does not “contain” the act, though its results might be said to ‘pre-exist virtually’ within him. And the act does not ‘synecdochically share’ in the agent, though certain ways of acting may be said to induce corresponding moods or traits of character.
Excerpt from Ruth 2004, p58



Alison-Ruth
Alison-Ruth
Latest page update: made by Alison-Ruth , Jan 10 2007, 12:35 AM EST (about this update About This Update Alison-Ruth inserted extract from thesis - Alison-Ruth

203 words added

view changes

- complete history)
Keyword tags: research theory
More Info: links to this page

Anonymous  (Get credit for your thread)


There are no threads for this page.  Be the first to start a new thread.

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)